Under Illinois law, pets are technically considered property, but any dog or cat owner knows that pets are really more like family members. Because of the fondness that many people have for their animals, it is unsurprising that pet custody becomes a contentious issue in many divorce cases, but it was actually just recently that Illinois courts determined whether divorced spouses have rights to pet visitation the same as they do with children.

Divorce Court Goes to the Dogs

In Re Marriage of Enders was one of the final cases to come out of the First District of the Illinois Court of Appeals in 2015. In the case, the wife filed the initial petition for divorce following 10 years of marriage, during which the couple acquired two dogs. While separated, the wife kept the dogs at her home because the husband was not allowed to keep pets at his apartment. He believed, however, that they would have joint custody of the canines and claimed that his landlord would allow the dogs to visit for short periods of time. After alleging that his ex-wife was denying him any contact with the dogs, he filed a petition for temporary weekend visitation, which was granted by the trial court. The wife appealed.

 Divorces, no matter the income level, can become very ugly very quickly. This is especially true for high value or high asset divorces in part because there is more room for mistakes. When a couple is attempting to divest various assets and properties, the more on the list, the greater the confusion, tension, and risk.

Common Mistakes

The first and most common mistake made by couples engaged in such a divorce is failing to properly account for all of their assets and liabilities. It is extremely important you take the time to list all of your assets and liabilities. While this may be a time consuming process, it will benefit you during the divorce proceedings. This way, you can account for all of the assets to which you may be entitled and you can account for any debts that may exist.

In a surprising move, the Illinois Supreme Court has decided it will hear a case involving a property dispute between former same-sex domestic partners. The surprise of this decision by the court comes in light of the 1979 Hewitt v. Hewitt decision. The state Supreme Court decided then that the courts should not decide property disputes between unmarried couples. However, with an increasing number of same-sex domestic partnerships (and in turn separation proceedings), the court is willing to evaluate if those same policy concerns apply to same-sex domestic partnerships and divorce now.

Current Case in Front of the Supreme Court

The case is Blumenthal v. Brewer, and involves a same sex couple who became domestic partners in 1982. They have three children, whom they have cross-adopted, and they officially registered as domestic partners in 2003. The parties separated in 2008. One party is a physician and the other a judge. The plaintiff (the physician) wants to partition the home she shared with her partner and the defendant (the judge) counter-sued for a trust over the home and doctor’s earnings. The plaintiff successfully argued in lower court that Illinois law does not recognize property claims between unmarried domestic partners courtesy of the Hewitt decision.